<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Erosion/Stormwater runoff</title>
		<link>http://mdwatershedgroups.forumotion.com/erosion-stormwater-runoff-f15/-t1.htm</link>
		<description></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:44:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>WSSC water quality monitoring</title>
			<link>http://mdwatershedgroups.forumotion.com/erosion-stormwater-runoff-f15/wssc-water-quality-monitoring-t12.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>mike78smith</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[The Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission has released the third set of results from its bacteria monitoring and tracking.  Most of the Anacostia tributaries in Maryland were tested, and many exceed the state standards for bacteria.  You can check out the results at <a href="http://www.fosc.org/Bacteria.htm" target="_blank">http://www.fosc.org/Bacteria.htm</a>]]></description>
			<category>Erosion/Stormwater runoff</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:44:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://mdwatershedgroups.forumotion.com/erosion-stormwater-runoff-f15/wssc-water-quality-monitoring-t12.htm#22</comments>
			<guid>http://mdwatershedgroups.forumotion.com/erosion-stormwater-runoff-f15/wssc-water-quality-monitoring-t12.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>